labath added a reviewer: jingham.
labath added a comment.
Would it be possible to fix this problem in the swig bindings instead? (i.e.
move the `std::min` stuff into the swig code). That way, the behavior of this
function will at least match that of snprintf, which will hopefully be less
surprising that what you've done here. (And it will also fix the inconsistency
noticed by @shafik).
================
Comment at: lldb/source/API/SBThread.cpp:337
+ }
else {
// NULL dst passed in, return the length needed to contain the
----------------
shafik wrote:
> The `else` branch feels inconsistent with the change above. Especially the `+
> 1`.
yep
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72086/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72086
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
