friss added a comment. Sorry that I haven't reviewed the patch, but there's something I'd like to point out before anyone invests a lot of time into plugin holes in our current template support code.
It would be great to fix the way templates are represented, because currently the debug info doesn't allow us to answer Clang's requests correctly. There is the beginning of a discussion here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180507/040689.html Basically, today the debug info will describe an entity named "Foo<int>". The accelerator tables all reference this name. So when Clang asks us if we know "Foo" (which is what happens when instantiating), we fail to find the right instantiations. The consensus of the above discussion was that we should change the debug info to have "Foo" as the name of any instantiation, with a child DIE describing the template arguments. Just doing this in the compiler causes test failures in LLDB, so there's some work to do in LLDB to support this. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69309/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69309 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
