JDevlieghere accepted this revision.
JDevlieghere added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

In D70137#1743032 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70137#1743032>, @rupprecht wrote:

> In D70137#1742766 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70137#1742766>, @JDevlieghere 
> wrote:
>
> > This is very nice, thanks!
> >
> > Any chance we could test this with a pexpect test?
>
>
> Absolutely. It was waaay more complicated than I expected due to funny 
> escaping somewhere between pexpect and lldb, but testing an actual command 
> seems to work. Hopefully I've captured that in the test doc comment.


Ha, I can imagine... Thanks for taking the time to make it work!

LGTM!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70137/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70137



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to