shafik marked an inline comment as done. shafik added a comment. In D69913#1739579 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913#1739579>, @jingham wrote:
> Why not have the FindFunctions lambda take a FunctionSP? It would be easy to > get the Function name out of the function in the lambda, and that would make > the function more general (and also match what the Foreach does... It was not obvious how they were using it at first, good catch. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
