mgorny marked 2 inline comments as done.
mgorny added a comment.
Well, are there any LLDB commands that can actually cause such an event to
happen? I haven't been able to find one to send a signal to thread in the first
place.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/NetBSD/NativeProcessNetBSD.cpp:454-455
+ case eStateStopped:
+ if (action->signal != LLDB_INVALID_SIGNAL_NUMBER)
+ return Status("Passing signal to suspended thread unsupported");
+
----------------
labath wrote:
> Maybe this could be an assert ?
Well, looking at the gdb protocol, it probably can't happen indeed. However,
when I was writing that I assumed 'ResumeActionList is the limit', and didn't
want to assert-crash if things were extended in the future.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/NetBSD/NativeProcessNetBSD.cpp:477-481
+ signal = siginfo->psi_siginfo.si_signo;
+ }
+
+ ret = PtraceWrapper(PT_CONTINUE, GetID(), reinterpret_cast<void *>(1),
+ signal);
----------------
labath wrote:
> (just curious) so you need to pass the signal both in the siginfo struct, and
> also to the PT_CONTINUE operation?
Yes. The former is not strictly necessary but the latter is obligatory.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70022/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70022
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
