jasonmolenda added a comment. In D62931#1724433 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62931#1724433>, @guiandrade wrote:
> Yeah, more tests would be useful. They made me notice an issue btw. I was > simply sending a 'g' packet and checking if the server replied back nicely; > however, IIUC with 'G' packets it isn't so simple because we also need to > send the registers data in the same packet. I'm not sure how I could do that, > and I'm also afraid that check could get too expensive. Do you have any idea > what could be a nice way to handle that? fwiw I can't imagine a stub that supports g but not G. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62931/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62931 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
