serge-sans-paille added a comment. (keeping the ball rolling) lYou want to exploit the presence of a sentinel in the domain of values of a given type. Maybe make that explicit through the method naming instead of using the `isValid` theme.
Some bibliography on the subject: https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/#!topic/std-proposals/46J1onhWJ-s/discussion. On a personal note, as much as I like the idea (and I really do like it), I'd rather have llvm::optional sticking to std::optional interface. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69230/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69230 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
