danalbert added a subscriber: enh.
danalbert added a comment.
In D68968#1710520 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68968#1710520>, @labath wrote:
> Independently, I am wondering if there's a better way to link the process id
> to a bundle. Using argv[0] might be ok if we're using it just for display
> purposes, but if we're going to be doing other stuff based on that
> identifier, it would be better to get it from a more reliable source.
> Unfortunately, I was not able to find a more "reasonable source", but maybe
> @danalbert has an idea.
@enh might
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Host/linux/Host.cpp:220-222
+ if (process_info.GetNameAsStringRef().empty() &&
+ !process_info.GetArg0().empty()) {
+ process_info.SetBundleID(process_info.GetArg0());
----------------
labath wrote:
> wallace wrote:
> > labath wrote:
> > > How sure are we that the app processes are the only ones which have the
> > > exe link unreadable? Will that be true on all phones or just the recent
> > > ones with all the selinux stuff?
> > >
> > > I was hoping that there is some more reliable way of fetching this
> > > information, but there doesn't seem to be anything except [[
> > > https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ActivityManager.RunningAppProcessInfo.html
> > > | ActivityManager.RunningAppProcessInfo ]], which I don't know if it can
> > > be accessed from lldb, either host- or device-side.
> > >
> > > @danalbert, any ideas here?
> > Another option I've just discovered is to invoke `pm list packages` to get
> > the list of all apks and if an Arg0 is in that list, then it's a package.
> > That seems good enough
> That should prevent us accidentally setting an incorrect bundle id, but it
> does not prevent a process from deliberately changing its argv[0] to the name
> of some other installed package. That seems suboptimal, particularly if we're
> later going to use start using the bundle id for other than just display
> purposes (e.g. for issuing "am kill" commands). So, I am still wondering if
> we shouldn't go back to using argv[0] for the purpose of "process list", and
> leave the "bundle id" field for cases where we can get this information from
> a more reliable source (e.g. reading it from the apk, or fetching it from the
> android package manager, etc). What do you think?
@enh
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68968/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68968
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
