shafik added a comment. In D68961#1709708 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68961#1709708>, @clayborg wrote:
> Have many compilers supported DW_AT_export_symbols for a while now? If not, > are there any serious issues introduced here that would change debugger > behavior if this attribute is not emitted by a compiler? Or is this a new fix > in clang that was recently introduced in order to fix an issue when debugging > in lldb? We don't except any regressions for code compiled with older compilers. We are fixing the case that unnamed classes are identified as anonymous. The anonymous classes cases should be caught in older revisions in `ClangASTContext::AddFieldToRecordType` which does a `Rec->setAnonymousStructOrUnion(true) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68961/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68961 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
