zturner added inline comments.

================
Comment at: source/Commands/CommandObjectTarget.cpp:2569
+          }
+          StreamString strm;
+          module_spec.GetUUID().Dump(&strm);
----------------
aprantl wrote:
> Can you manually double-check this one?
For large complex cases like this, it might make sense to convert them to early 
returns first.  That makes the size of the if blocks smaller so less chance of 
messing up.


================
Comment at: source/Commands/CommandObjectTarget.cpp:2601-2607
+      } else {
+        result.AppendError(
+            "one or more executable image paths must be specified");
+        result.SetStatus(eReturnStatusFailed);
+        return false;
+      }
       } else {
----------------
Something is wrong with indentation here.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D55574/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D55574



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
  • [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D55... Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits
    • [Lldb-commits] [PATCH... Zachary Turner via Phabricator via lldb-commits

Reply via email to