lawrence_danna marked 6 inline comments as done. lawrence_danna added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp:1238-1245 +// OwnedPythonFile<Base>::IsValid() chains into Base::IsValid() +// File::IsValid() is false by default, but for the following classes +// we want the file to be considered valid as long as the python bits +// are valid. +class PresumptivelyValidFile : public File { +public: + bool IsValid() const override { return true; }; ---------------- labath wrote: > How about if OwnedPythonFile defines `IsValid()` as `IsPythonObjectValid() || > Base::IsValid()`. Then PythonIOFile could redefine it to be simply > `IsPythonObjectValid()` without the need for the extra class? If I did that then a SimplePythonFile would still be valid if the file was closed on the python side... seems like the wrong behavior. ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp:1251 + PythonIOFile(const PythonFile &file, bool borrowed) + : OwnedPythonFile(file, borrowed){}; + ---------------- labath wrote: > no semicolon huh? ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp:1278 +class BinaryPythonFile : public PythonIOFile { + friend class PythonFile; + ---------------- labath wrote: > What is this needed for? I don't see the PythonFile class doing anything > funny (and it probably shouldn't). python API functions expect you to check for an exception with PyErr_Occured() and clear it before calling into them again. If you don't things usually work out OK, except on a debug build in which an assert will trip. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68188/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68188 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits