JDevlieghere added a comment. In D68248#1688975 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68248#1688975>, @vsk wrote:
> Sweet! Does this 'automatically' fix the 'llvm-argdumper has issues escaping > JSON-ified input' issue we discussed in person? No, that uses the JSON class that Pavel mentioned. My hope is to remove that altogether in favor of the LLVM counterpart. In D68248#1689855 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68248#1689855>, @aprantl wrote: > Cool. I mean both are supposed to be JSON, but are we expecting any fallout > from a debugserver using the old library vs and lldb using the new one? I > suppose not.. I ran the test suite with the just-built debugserver and didn't notice any regressions. If this does come up we should fix the debugserver implementation. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68248/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68248 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
