shafik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/include/lldb/Breakpoint/BreakpointOptions.h:120
+ ///
BreakpointOptions(const char *condition, bool enabled = true,
int32_t ignore = 0, bool one_shot = false,
----------------
mib wrote:
> shafik wrote:
> > You have a lot of `bool` parameters, these are hard to distinguish when
> > calling the function and easy to get mixed up during refactors and
> > subsequent merge conflicts. It would probably be better to combine these
> > `bool` options into a `struct` and then each option has an explicit name
> > that that will be assigned to which makes it explicit which options are
> > being chosen at the call site.
> I only added the `bool inject_condition` parameter to the `BreakpointOptions`
> constructor. I also added documentation that was missing for the other
> parameters. I don't think having a struct for those options is a necessary
> since that's what the `BreakpointOptions` class is for.
Sadly we won't have designated initializers until C++20 [see
godbolt](https://godbolt.org/z/2xlti5) but instead of `bool` we can use enums
and that would clarify the code at the calling site. As discussed this can be
done as a patch after landing this change,
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66248/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66248
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
