sgraenitz abandoned this revision. sgraenitz added a comment. In D65939#1620780 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65939#1620780>, @labath wrote:
> So, why doesn't LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR suffice? It looks like that ought to work > even in standalone builds... LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR affects the entire build tree. If another subproject causes a warning the build fails. In a way, you are right that this is sufficient, because the no-warnings policy seems to work well upstream. The issue I was trying to solve is, that we can't use the setting with some external subprojects, because they are not strictly warning free. But then it may be better to have downstream. I agree. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65939/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65939 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
