JDevlieghere added a comment. In D65469#1608737 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65469#1608737>, @jingham wrote:
> If we don't want to forget that there was specific useful info, we could gate > this patch on implementing the "reproducer generate <FEATURE>" feature. That > should be easy to add if we're clear this this is the right design for > reproducers. But I don't think that "bugreport unwind" was all that much > used, so it might be better to design this at leisure. Until the reproducers prove to be insufficient to capture a particular bug, I don't plan to invest in this. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65469/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65469 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
