clayborg added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/lldb/Symbol/FuncUnwinders.h:117
+ class LazyPlan {
+ lldb::UnwindPlanSP m_plan_sp;
+
----------------
labath wrote:
> clayborg wrote:
> > maybe use:
> >
> > ```
> > llvm::Optional<lldb::UnwindPlanSP> m_plan_sp;
> > ```
> >
> > Then just check if it has no value, and if so compute and set it either to
> > a valid shared pointer or an empty one?
> That would work, but it would increase the size of the FuncUnwinders struct
> by about 80 bytes (8 bytes for each LazyPlan object). I can do that, but
> given that "uncomputed value" trick is internal to the class and does not
> leak out or affect the implementation, it seemed like a worthwhile
> optimization to me.
Actually isn't there a pointer union class that can steal bool bits from the
aligned values and not increase the size?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61779/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61779
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
