labath added a comment. Greg, what do you think about the current version of this patch.
Joerg, I propose to check the patch in in the current form, as this solves existing issues in the lldb's ELF representation and improves the overall consistency of lldb's representation of object files. I'm not opposed to changing things again if we find a use case that this breaks, but I can do that only once I know what that use case is (and that might involve making changes to the generic representation of modules in lldb). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55998/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55998 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
