zturner marked an inline comment as done.
zturner added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/lit/SymbolFile/NativePDB/local-variables.cpp:31-37
+// CHECK-NEXT: 14 }
+// CHECK-NEXT: 15
+// CHECK-NEXT: 16 int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+// CHECK-NEXT: -> 17 int SomeLocal = argc * 2;
+// CHECK-NEXT: 18 return Function(SomeLocal, 'a');
+// CHECK-NEXT: 19 }
+// CHECK-NEXT: 20
----------------
labath wrote:
> I'm not thrilled by all of the hard-coded information (line numbers, the
> default format of stop-information printing) here, which is irrelevant for
> the tested functionality here. This will make it very hard to update this
> test if there is ever a need for (perhaps one would like to remove the line
> break in the RUN: command once the `env LLDB_USE_NATIVE_PDB_READER=1` part
> disappears), or the default way of printing stop information in lldb changes.
> It doesn't seem like a maintainable long term strategy.
I felt the same way TBH, but wanted to see what the feedback would be like.
What do you think about just removing all the backtrace lines from the check
output and only checking the print commands and their output?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55575/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55575
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
