Yea that sounds reasonable On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:07 AM Pavel Labath <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 09:25, Aleksandr Urakov via lldb-commits wrote: > > > > I thought about what Stella have said, and it seems that I have found a > > good solution for this. We can use something like `tempfile` > > (https://docs.python.org/3.7/library/tempfile.html) for every > internally > > generated file of the script. It will guarantee us the uniqueness of the > > file. But for the uniqueness of files named by script parameters the > > script user will remain responsible. > > > > What do you think about the such approach? > > Sounds good to me. That's pretty much what the real compiler driver does > when you ask it to run in the "compile-and-link" mode. >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
