davide added a comment. In D54692#1308071 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54692#1308071>, @clayborg wrote:
> Would be great to see old and new output like Zach suggested. Is there a > reason we need to use TableGen? Other command line tools just use llvm:🆑:opt > stuff. Seems a bit obtuse to use TableGen? I'm afraid this is not true. lld uses TableGen and that was a big success. See https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lld/blob/master/ELF/Options.td (considering that linkers have to handle all the annoying cmdline compatibility with gcc, e.g. options which take single or double underscores). FWIW, I'm in favour of this change. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D54692/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D54692 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
