JDevlieghere added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54682#1302436, @zturner wrote:
> I’ve often thought we should convert LLDB’s command line parsing code over > to use either cl::opt or lib/Option. This would also solve the problem you > describe here at the same time. > > Do you think it’s worth trying to do this? I believe both would have the issue that options are not processed in the order specified. I guess it depends on whether people care about this? Happy to give that a shot if the consensus is "nobody cares" :-) Repository: rLLDB LLDB https://reviews.llvm.org/D54682 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
