JDevlieghere added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54221#1290572, @labath wrote:
> I recall something about linux on arm having a magic unmodifiable (even by > ptrace) page of memory, so this could be useful there too. However, it's not > clear to me how a user is going to figure out that he needs to enable this > setting. Would it make sense to automatically try setting a hardware > breakpoint if software breakpoint fails? My main concern would be that hardware breakpoints are a limited resource and not something we want to make transparent to the user, because it's only a matter of time before it fails. We'd also have to think about what happens to a breakpoint when one of its locations is a software bploc and the other a hardware one. I'm not against the idea but it would require some more thinking and definitely a separate patch. https://reviews.llvm.org/D54221 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
