See the other email thread. The bots have been broken since September, all of them complain about missing FileCheck executable
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:58 PM Vedant Kumar via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > vsk added a comment. > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478#1262710, @stella.stamenova wrote: > > > Unfortunately, the bots are broken because of the FileCheck issue, so I > can't confirm with them, but I see a number of these tests fail in our > local testing. Some fail on both Windows and Linux and some just fail on > Linux. Here are the failing tests: > > > > Linux: > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_call_site/TestDisambiguateCallSite.py > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_paths_to_common_sink/TestDisambiguatePathsToCommonSink.py > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_tail_call_seq/TestDisambiguateTailCallSeq.py > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/inlining_and_tail_calls/TestInliningAndTailCalls.py > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support/TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_message/TestArtificialFrameStepOutMessage.py > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/TestUnambiguousTailCalls.py > > > > Windows: > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support/TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py > > lldb-Suite :: > functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_or_return/TestSteppingOutWithArtificialFrames.py > > > > > > Let me know what you need to investigate. > > > Strange, I didn't get any bot failure notifications in the days after this > landed. Could you share the output from the failing tests? > > > Repository: > rLLDB LLDB > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478 > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
