stella.stamenova added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52618#1250909, @zturner wrote:
> One idea would be to define some lit substitutions like %debuginfo. It’s > true you can produce a gcc style command line that will be equivalent to a > clang-cl invocation but it won’t be easy. eg you’ll needing to pass > -fms-compatibility as well as various -I for includes. > > It may be easier to have substitutions instead Another option would be to define a way in lit to specify a command to run based on requirements - similar how we can use "windows" or "linux" in the "requires" command. https://reviews.llvm.org/D52618 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
