aleksandr.urakov added a subscriber: zturner. aleksandr.urakov added a comment.
Yes, I have understood that, thank you. It may be not trivial in a case of multiple nested unnamed unions/structs, but it's solvable for clang-emitted PDBs. But I'm not sure about cl-emitted PDBs too. Can we leave the things as in this commit (and allow the fields overlapping in `MicrosoftRecordLayoutBuilder`)? So fields of nested unnamed UDTs will be treated as outer structure's fields. It will allow us to support both `clang` and `cl` PDBs, but what are the drawbacks of such solution? https://reviews.llvm.org/D49410 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
