davide added a comment.
This is getting really close. Please try the `lldbInline` test format and
revert the unrelated bits and I'll take another look.
Thanks!
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/CPlusPlusLanguage.cpp:971-972
g_formatters.push_back([](lldb_private::ValueObject &valobj,
- lldb::DynamicValueType,
- FormatManager &
- fmt_mgr) -> SyntheticChildren::SharedPointer
{
+ lldb::DynamicValueType, FormatManager &fmt_mgr)
+ -> SyntheticChildren::SharedPointer {
static CXXSyntheticChildren::SharedPointer formatter_sp(
----------------
this looks unrelated?
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxx.cpp:179-223
+ CompilerType pair_type(
+ __i_->GetCompilerType().GetTypeTemplateArgument(0));
+ std::string name;
+ uint64_t bit_offset_ptr;
+ uint32_t bitfield_bit_size_ptr;
+ bool is_bitfield_ptr;
+ pair_type = pair_type.GetFieldAtIndex(
----------------
this looks like .. unrelated?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
