JDevlieghere added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D48782#1148376, @labath wrote:
> Then, for the integration test part, I propose to come up with a more generic > way to specify the kind of debug info to generate. I don't have this fully > thought out yet, but I have been thinking of something that could wrap the > compiler invocation with some user specified script. Then we could use the > same mechanism to run DWP and DWZ with any kind of crazy compiler flags we > think of (which is definitely useful when bringing up support for a new kind > of debug info format). If someone has a particular interest in a specific > combo, he can set up a bot which runs tests in this mode (details about who > would be responsible for fixing failures TBD) I really like that idea. It sounds similar to the EXPENSIVE_CHECKS we have for LLVM. Personally I'd love to have an overnight job that runs the test suite with DWARF5 for example. https://reviews.llvm.org/D48782 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
