aleksandr.urakov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47708#1124743, @labath wrote:
> We have an lldb-test executable, which we use for writing tests (see tests in > lit/SymbolFile). It's `symbols` subcommand currently just dumps their > contents and then we match that. > > Your checks don't have any assumptions about the input hardcoded in them. > This may be both good and bad, but anyway, my idea was to add a `--verify` > flag to lldb-test (similar to how `llvm-dwarfdump --verify` works) which > would run these checks (and any other we can think of later). Then, the test > would simply consist of running `lldb-test symbols --verify your.exe` and > asserting that it returns success. Thank you, I'll implement this. Will be it better to create a different review for this? https://reviews.llvm.org/D47708 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
