stella.stamenova added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47679#1120177, @polyakov.alex wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47679#1120172, @stella.stamenova wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47679#1120081, @polyakov.alex wrote:
> >
> > > Due to https://reviews.llvm.org/D47678 we can enable this test with a 
> > > XFAIL directive for Windows.
> >
> >
> > Not true. As I said, the original review when I disabled the test has the 
> > log of what happens when you give it the correct path and the test still 
> > hangs in that scenario. If you XFAIL it, it will hang.
>
>
> Yep, I got the same on Linux. But if you run it through llvm-lit(not `lldb-mi 
> < input-file`) it won't hang.


I can apply your change locally on Monday and double-check. You have to 
remember that the behavior of the tools and test suite is not exactly the same 
on Linux and Windows.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D47679



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to