On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 18:11, Leonard Mosescu <mose...@google.com> wrote:
> The mix of backward and forward slashes doesn't impact my current project but it would be nice to have a consistent path syntax (both within a single path and also cross platforms). >> Leonard, is it reasonable to assume that all paths in the minidumps will be >> absolute (and thus resolving is pointless anyway)? > Yes. Mostly :) For non-Windows minidumps the way we capture module names is a bit fuzzy (we depend on loader data structures and things like /proc/self/maps). > What exactly does "resolving the path" means here? Breaking down into path components and re-assembling it doesn't seem particularly interesting. It is pretty much what "realpath" does, but we also have some additional logic to handle ~ and such. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
