On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:53:20 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:22:45 +0200, Greg Clayton wrote: > > If this is all in the same file, then the offsets are all in the > > .debug_info? What am I missing? > > LLVM was asserting when I reported the same lldb::user_id_t referenced by > multiple CUs. From our discussion it looks to me that maybe I just did not > have the DWZ common symbol file with proper offset. Otherwise maybe I can > report the same lldb::user_id_t if multiple CUs reference the same DIE from > DW_TAG_partial_unit? As LLVM considers all CUs in a file as the same context. > I will try that again.
In such case if you are sure no real DIEs remapping (to make each inclusion of DW_TAG_partial_unit unique) is needed then no remapping DWARFPartialUnit is needed and your removal of my DWARFUnit abstraction by Data() (which I incorrectly reverted) is also OK. (Although I will believe it only after I code it; this is what I coded first but I could have some other bugs there that time.) Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
