If you check the expression log, you will see the printf() function declaration
and any others we add:
(lldb) log enable lldb expr
(lldb) 2+3
...
#ifndef NULL
#define NULL (__null)
#endif
#ifndef Nil
#define Nil (__null)
#endif
#ifndef nil
#define nil (__null)
#endif
#ifndef YES
#define YES ((BOOL)1)
#endif
#ifndef NO
#define NO ((BOOL)0)
#endif
typedef __INT8_TYPE__ int8_t;
typedef __UINT8_TYPE__ uint8_t;
typedef __INT16_TYPE__ int16_t;
typedef __UINT16_TYPE__ uint16_t;
typedef __INT32_TYPE__ int32_t;
typedef __UINT32_TYPE__ uint32_t;
typedef __INT64_TYPE__ int64_t;
typedef __UINT64_TYPE__ uint64_t;
typedef __INTPTR_TYPE__ intptr_t;
typedef __UINTPTR_TYPE__ uintptr_t;
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
typedef __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ ptrdiff_t;
typedef unsigned short unichar;
extern "C"
{
int printf(const char * __restrict, ...);
}
typedef signed char BOOL;
void
$__lldb_expr(void *$__lldb_arg)
{
;
/*LLDB_BODY_START*/
2+3;
/*LLDB_BODY_END*/
}
...
> On Mar 13, 2018, at 11:04 AM, Davide Italiano <dccitali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 13, 2018, at 10:37 AM, Davide Italiano via lldb-commits
>>> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> An alternative proposed by Fred which is an OK middle ground IMHO is
>>> that of not inserting a decl for the unmangled name, but treat this
>>> symbol always as-it-is.
>>> i.e. if we have a symbol _Znwm in some object, we don't insert a decl
>>> for `operator new(unsigned long)` but for _Znwm itself.
>>>
>>> Greg, Jason, would that work for you guys?
>>
>> I would be ok with that.
>>
>
> I'm going to send a review for this soon.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Davide
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
