labath added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281#992359, @aprantl wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281#992295, @aprantl wrote: > > > There are a few test failures, but they look manageable. I will need help > > resolving them though: > > > Updated list: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-windows7-android/builds/7843 > FAIL: > TestLoadUnload.LoadUnloadTestCase.test_lldb_process_load_and_unload_commands_dwarf > test3 HT4A1JT02945,aarch64-linux-android-clang,aarch64,tcp,-lldb-mi 8 > unexpected failures failed ( 41 mins, 48 secs ) > stdio > FAIL: > TestBreakpointInGlobalConstructor.TestBreakpointInGlobalConstructors.test > FAIL: TestMoveNearest.TestMoveNearest.test > FAIL: > TestGlobalVariables.GlobalVariablesTestCase.test_c_global_variables_dwarf > FAIL: TestGlobalVariables.GlobalVariablesTestCase.test_c_global_variables_dwo > FAIL: > TestGlobalVariables.GlobalVariablesTestCase.test_c_global_variables_gmodules > FAIL: > TestLoadUnload.LoadUnloadTestCase.test_lldb_process_load_and_unload_commands_dwarf > FAIL: > TestLoadUnload.LoadUnloadTestCase.test_lldb_process_load_and_unload_commands_dwo > FAIL: > TestLoadUnload.LoadUnloadTestCase.test_lldb_process_load_and_unload_commands_gmodules > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-android/builds/10506 > test7 emulator-5554,i686-linux-android-clang,i386,abstract,-lldb-mi failed > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-darwin-13.4/builds/8462 > test2 5A24000830,aarch64-linux-android-gcc,aarch64,tcp,-lldb-mi:-watchpoint > 2 unexpected failures failed > FAIL: TestMoveNearest.TestMoveNearest.test > FAIL: > TestBreakpointInGlobalConstructor.TestBreakpointInGlobalConstructors.test Most of these turned out to be caused by leftover shared libraries in the source tree (fun fact: "svn status" refuses to list the .so files even though they are not present in the svn:ignore list), when I cleaned those up, the tests started passing again. There is still the TestLoadUnload failure on the windows bot, which I suspect to be a real issue (we've changed the test a bit, and now it passes full paths to lldb, so I suspect a directory-separator issue), but I have not looked into that yet. I'll handle that on our side in the coming days. All in all, I would say this was rather a painless experience. I think we are ready for phase two. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
