davide added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42656#991065, @jingham wrote:
> There are a whole bunch of other tests that test completion in this file that > use the exact same mechanism but don't seem to be flakey. Why is this one > test flakey? > > If for instance it's because "Fo" ends up being ambiguous because we chose > too common a start string, then you could trivially fix the test by choosing > a more uncommon name to complete on. But I'd want to know why this test is > flakey first. OK, I'll take a look at this further. https://reviews.llvm.org/D42656 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
