aprantl added a comment. > Why not just look for the AVX registers by name that are only available if > they are correctly detected by the native lldb-server or debugserver? Then we > can avoid all of this. If we don't execute any instructions that crash the > program, we can stop before any specialized AVX instructions are executed and > kill the program is we don't see a register by name?
I considered doing something like this, but I want to avoid relying on the AVX2 support in LLDB to work in order to detect AVX2. If I use an LLDB mechanism for this then (exaggerating here!) someone could remove AVX support from LLDB and this test would still pass. https://reviews.llvm.org/D41962 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
