labath added subscribers: emaste, krytarowski, ted.
labath added a comment.

I'm adding some people with non-linux non-x86/arm targets who use this plugin 
for more visibility. I have a couple of small comments, but in general, I am 
happy with this.



================
Comment at: 
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/breakpoint/global_constructor/TestBreakpointInGlobalConstructor.py:24
         self.line_main = line_number('main.cpp', '// !BR_main')
+        if not self.platformIsDarwin():
+          if lldb.remote_platform:
----------------
The right way to handle this is to use the environment which is returned from 
`self.registerSharedLibrariesWithTarget` as the launch environment (you'll need 
to launch using the SB API). The reason that TestLoadUnload does not handle 
this is probably because it predates this function.


================
Comment at: 
source/Plugins/DynamicLoader/POSIX-DYLD/DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD.cpp:224
+      // If we cannot establish rendezvous breakpoint right now
+      // we'll try again at enty point.
+      ProbeEntry();
----------------
s/enty/entry


================
Comment at: 
source/Plugins/DynamicLoader/POSIX-DYLD/DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD.cpp:379
+    }
+    break_addr = symbol->GetLoadAddress(&m_process->GetTarget());
+    if (break_addr == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
----------------
It should be possible to create the breakpoint via `Target::CreateBreakpoint` 
(the overload that lets you specify a list of function names) instead of 
manually resolving the symbols... Have you tried doing that?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D41533



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to