labath requested changes to this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
I think this makes the code hard to read. A much better approach would be to
use `Expected<T>` + factory function pattern. So you would have something like:
Expected<unique_ptr<LLVMCDisassembler>> LLVMCDisassembler::Create(...) {
do_first_thing_that_can_fail(...);
if (first_thing_failed)
return make_string_error("First thing failed");
do_second_thing_that_can_fail();
...
return make_unique<LLVMCDisassembler>(...); // can't fail
}
I think this is much more readable than the lambda approach, and it also allows
you to get rid of the IsValid() function, as we only construct valid objects.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41584
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
