On 5 December 2017 at 17:44, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Didn't someone recently submit a patch to allow relocation of .o files? That > should have taken care of the issue, no? >
I take it you mean D38142. This made sure that the memory we store the object file in is writable, which makes sure that we are able to apply at least some relocations. However, it does nothing about the fact that we support only a handful of relocations that someone needed at some point *and* the fact that we assume that all relocatoins are x86 relocations. It will take some work before we can honestly claim that we support relocating .o files. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
