davide requested changes to this revision. davide added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This one is a little weird when written as unittest. Not the worst thing, but I agree it should use `llvm-lit`. Can you give it a shot, Pavel? If that doesn't work, we should at least evaluate the amount of work needed to get `llvm-lit` to run with `lldb` before dismissing it entirely. BTW, nice to see lldb getting more and more tests, regardless :) https://reviews.llvm.org/D40616 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
