yaml2core would be an excellent idea for a tool. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:48 PM Davide Italiano via Phabricator via lldb-commits <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> davide added subscribers: vsk, aprantl, davide. > davide added a comment. > > I thought about this, and it's the only patch from your patchset that I > don't feel really confident about. > I'm afraid it's a little risky to add more code to the objectfile reader > without having proper unittesting. > In particular, we might want to either check in an object file (not so > ideal) or use `llvm-mc` to produce a file with the correct section. > More generally, when we want to test debug info either we want to > piggyback on mc or yaml2obj. > If none of them suffices, we should think about having a tool that takes a > textual representation of some sort (YAML seems a good start) and produces > a core dump to be passed to LLDB. > @sas what do you think? > cc:ing @vsk / @aprantl for thoughts. > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D40539 > > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-commits mailing list > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
