If it works, is easy, and doesn’t regress anything I’d honestly rather just disable linker gc.
But I’m not familiar with the method you mentioned. I thought linker gc happens when you have -function-sections, -fdata-sections, and —gc-sections. Wouldn’t it work to just not have those? Or is something else going on? On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:17 AM Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > On 7 November 2017 at 12:46, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > I just wonder if we should be disabling linker gc across the board for > all > > tests unless you explicitly opt in. > > > > Seems like something we would want only rarely, if ever > > Yes, that might be an option. I don't really have a strong opinion on > that, either way. FWIW, this is the only test that seems to be > impacted by this. >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
