hintonda added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/lldb/Utility/FileSpec.h:65-69
+ enum PathSyntax : unsigned char {
ePathSyntaxPosix,
ePathSyntaxWindows,
ePathSyntaxHostNative
};
----------------
zturner wrote:
> This is actually a very nice change, as it reduces the size of `FileSpec` by
> a couple of bytes. I think you can submit this change as a one-liner by
> itself, independent of this patch.
I suppose it depends on you compiler/OS, but this by it self doesn't change the
size of FileSpec at all -- just changes the padding from 3 to 6. It's still
the size of 3 pointers due to alignment -- at least that's my understanding.
However, if you did have a way to encode this stuff into the two existing
pointers, it might help -- you still need at least 4 bits if I'm not mistaken.
================
Comment at: include/lldb/Utility/FileSpec.h:557
mutable bool m_is_resolved = false; ///< True if this path has been resolved.
- PathSyntax
- m_syntax; ///< The syntax that this path uses (e.g. Windows / Posix)
+ bool m_is_regex = false; ///< Filename is a regular expression.
};
----------------
zturner wrote:
> I thought in previous comments we had decided that this wasn't really the
> right direction, and that `FileSpec` should represent one file. //If// we
> want this functionality in LLDB (and again, I'm not convinced), it should be
> done in such a way that the `FileSpec` class remains unmodified. We should
> not have to touch this class for any of this.
I actually spent quite a bit of time trying to do it the other way, i.e., not
touching FileSpec, but the diff got so big, I decided it was probably a
mistake. I still have it in a local branch, but it's not ready to commit.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39436
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
