xiaobai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39307#907220, @clayborg wrote:
> It is a nice idea. I would still rather fix this in clang so it doesn't ask > us about a variable it already knows about. Though this might be a good > solution until we can fix it for real though. Sean or Jim? From what I can tell, in clang it looks like it's looking for a redeclaration of parameters (something like `int foo(int x, int x)`). Not entirely sure why it does that, and I'm not entirely sure why it would need to look beyond the Function Declaration scope to do that. When I get a chance, I can look into it more. https://reviews.llvm.org/D39307 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
