ted added a comment. We build lldb, clang and tools for Hexagon only, and call them hexagon-lldb, hexagon-clang, etc. The test infrastructure is smart enough to pick up hexagon-lldb-mi if we tell it to run with hexagon-lldb using --executable; will it be smart enough to run an in-tree hexagon-clang?
@labath, we run on Windows using hexagon-clang and hexagon-clang++; don't forget the embedded cases when choosing compilers and running tests. I'm all for removing redundant variables. https://reviews.llvm.org/D39215 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
