labath created this revision. Herald added a subscriber: mgorny. Using the in-tree clang should be the default test configuration as that is the one compiler that we can be sure everyone has (better reproducibility of test results). Also, it should hopefully reduce the impact of pr35040.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39215 Files: lit/CMakeLists.txt Index: lit/CMakeLists.txt =================================================================== --- lit/CMakeLists.txt +++ lit/CMakeLists.txt @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ set(ENABLE_SHARED 0) endif(BUILD_SHARED_LIBS) -option(LLDB_TEST_CLANG "Use in-tree clang when testing lldb" Off) +option(LLDB_TEST_CLANG "Use in-tree clang when testing lldb" On) set(LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER "" CACHE STRING "C compiler to use when testing LLDB") set(LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER "" CACHE STRING "C++ compiler to use when testing LLDB")
Index: lit/CMakeLists.txt =================================================================== --- lit/CMakeLists.txt +++ lit/CMakeLists.txt @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ set(ENABLE_SHARED 0) endif(BUILD_SHARED_LIBS) -option(LLDB_TEST_CLANG "Use in-tree clang when testing lldb" Off) +option(LLDB_TEST_CLANG "Use in-tree clang when testing lldb" On) set(LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER "" CACHE STRING "C compiler to use when testing LLDB") set(LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER "" CACHE STRING "C++ compiler to use when testing LLDB")
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
