jingham accepted this revision.
jingham added a comment.

This looks okay for now.  It will end up sending a Running & then a Stopped 
event.  That's a little awkward, but that happens in the ordinary course of 
debugging anyway so it shouldn't freak anybody out.

It would be better to find a place where this can be fixed before we send the 
running event, but that's going to take more thinking, and I don't see that 
desire should block this patch.  But can you file another PR to go figure out 
how to fix this closer to the source, so we don't forget to fix this next time 
we're in the bowels of the process event code?

Thanks!


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37651



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to