clayborg added a comment. Thanks for the info. Does this seem like it is a compiler bug? Seems like there should be a DW_AT_comp_dir if the DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name is relative? Is it written in the DWO spec that if the DW_AT_comp_dir is empty then it is referring to itself? I would rather not hack LLDB if we can avoid it. If this is a long released compiler generating this, then we do need a fix in LLDB since it will be running into these binaries from here on out. If this is a new compiler, lets fix the compiler. Let me know which case this is.
Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D37295 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
