felipepiovezan wrote:

> Side idea: you could write a "unit test" that starts a process using the 
> internal C++ API and maybe that will use the packets? That at least would 
> delay the API question.

Yeah, let me have a look at that. Either that, or just punt on having a test 
that actually uses the new packet since, in theory, it is already battle-tested 
elsewhere.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172026
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to