charles-zablit wrote: > > Please see the following RFC: > > [discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-drop-support-running-llvm-on-windows-vista-7-8/80619/23](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-drop-support-running-llvm-on-windows-vista-7-8/80619/23) > > This RFC was explicitly rejected; I think a new RFC should be posted to > determine whether this is acceptable to the community or not.
I have just created a new RFC to discuss this: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-drop-support-for-lldb-on-windows-vista-7-8-and-early-versions-of-10/89037 > @charles-zablit Is it possible otherwise to gate > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168729 under a runtime feature > flag? Such as checking the OS version at runtime and dynamically retrieving > the virtual console APIs. We’re already doing that in some places in > llvm/lib/Support/. I have not tried it, but I think It is possible yes. However, `lldb-dap` will greatly benefit from this new ConPTY API and I think saying we _support_ it on Windows Vista/7/8 with a limited/broken subset of features is confusing. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170284 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
