igorkudrin wrote:

> I would have thought finish from the epilogue had the same issue as from the 
> "body" of the function but you've apparently proven that not to be the case.

Perhaps I was not clear enough. As I understand it, the original test was 
supposed to demonstrate an issue with stepping out from the last instruction of 
a function after hitting a breakpoint at that location. Probably, prologue and 
epilogue code are not generated for empty functions on some targets, but it is 
on Linux/x64, for example.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161788
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to